<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery Performance Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/</link>
	<description>Dave Artz and his discoveries in web design and development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:09:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mads Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-2/#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mads Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5059</guid>
		<description>Good learning experience on getting my jquery scripts perform even better! Good job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good learning experience on getting my jquery scripts perform even better! Good job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy r4 ds</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-2/#comment-5055</link>
		<dc:creator>buy r4 ds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5055</guid>
		<description>Nice catch Joseph – I had meant that to use a jQuery selector for that ID.  But that’s news to me on being able to pass document.getElementById(‘blah’) to the jQuery context, seems like that could be useful. Do you have any idea whether it is better performance-wise to do that rather than $(&#039;blah&#039;).find(&#039;blah&#039;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch Joseph – I had meant that to use a jQuery selector for that ID.  But that’s news to me on being able to pass document.getElementById(‘blah’) to the jQuery context, seems like that could be useful. Do you have any idea whether it is better performance-wise to do that rather than $(&#8217;blah&#8217;).find(&#8217;blah&#8217;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Irish</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-2/#comment-5050</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5050</guid>
		<description>Great rules Dave, these have helped a lot of developers.
I have some more stuff about selector optimization and some other goodies in my talk on jQuery Anti-Patterns for Performance:
http://paulirish.com/perf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great rules Dave, these have helped a lot of developers.<br />
I have some more stuff about selector optimization and some other goodies in my talk on jQuery Anti-Patterns for Performance:<br />
<a href="http://paulirish.com/perf" rel="nofollow">http://paulirish.com/perf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtzStudio</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-2/#comment-5030</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtzStudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5030</guid>
		<description>@Erik - thanks, I can&#039;t believe I did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erik &#8211; thanks, I can&#8217;t believe I did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zsiswick</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-2/#comment-5029</link>
		<dc:creator>zsiswick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5029</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the thorough article. I have had performance concerns with using jQuery on a larger production website, and I will be utilizing some of the strategies you outlined moving forward. Adding bookmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the thorough article. I have had performance concerns with using jQuery on a larger production website, and I will be utilizing some of the strategies you outlined moving forward. Adding bookmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Kallen</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5026</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Kallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5026</guid>
		<description>The article is good, but your example for binding to parent is bad. The focus event is one of those that do NOT bubble. Replace it with another event that does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is good, but your example for binding to parent is bad. The focus event is one of those that do NOT bubble. Replace it with another event that does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtzStudio</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtzStudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5022</guid>
		<description>@Bart - They&#039;re actually the same thing when you dig into the code, so I think it comes down to your preference. A fun thing to try is using Firebug and its Breakpoint feature, so you can peak under the hood at what jQuery is doing. It&#039;s sometimes enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bart &#8211; They&#8217;re actually the same thing when you dig into the code, so I think it comes down to your preference. A fun thing to try is using Firebug and its Breakpoint feature, so you can peak under the hood at what jQuery is doing. It&#8217;s sometimes enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Sweet</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5018</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5018</guid>
		<description>&#039;nother tip, not related to any of the rules.

If you&#039;re enumerating over a an array, use a natve for/in loop, not $.each. It&#039;s must faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;nother tip, not related to any of the rules.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re enumerating over a an array, use a natve for/in loop, not $.each. It&#8217;s must faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5016</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5016</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great post. Was exactly what I was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great post. Was exactly what I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.artzstudio.com/2009/04/jquery-performance-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5008</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artzstudio.com/?p=83#comment-5008</guid>
		<description>Thanks for some nice tips. 

Regarding the subqueries, I wonder which way is faster:
  var $traffic_light = $(&#039;#traffic_light&#039;),

  $red = $traffic_light.find(&#039;.red&#039;)
or
  $red = $(&#039;.red&#039;, $traffic_light)

I usually use the second one, with context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for some nice tips. </p>
<p>Regarding the subqueries, I wonder which way is faster:<br />
  var $traffic_light = $(&#8217;#traffic_light&#8217;),</p>
<p>  $red = $traffic_light.find(&#8217;.red&#8217;)<br />
or<br />
  $red = $(&#8217;.red&#8217;, $traffic_light)</p>
<p>I usually use the second one, with context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
